Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Coordinating Team Action


This chapter focused mainly on special education students.  I feel McHarg does a great job with parent relationships, but the information will only remind us and possibly inspire us to go beyond the expected. 
The information regarding aides (paraprofessionals) is most beneficial.  There is a communication “hole” due to lack of time, an aide’s paid schedule, and role assumptions.  I am hopeful that the new sped form will eliminate the assumptions and help us define our roles more effectively.  But…the issue remains of not having time to collaborate with the aides.  Due to us losing 2 aides, our collaboration time with them has had to be removed in an effort to cover the high needs students in our building. 
If you have a creative solution to this, please share it in the blog. 

Coordinating Team Action:
Teacher and Class Paperwork – A plan summarizing each student’s general support needs, when the classroom teacher meets with the special education teacher, any peer supports used, type of support and plan to follow if difficulties arise.    Information on school schedules of special education support (or any paperwork on a child) is confidential and should not be openly displayed or discussed; use of student initials or codes rather than actual names is preferable.
  I think our new forms will meet this objective.  The most important thing is to use an alternate identifying source (student number) and keep copies to track progress. 
Coordinating across Team Members – When students require services from related services staff, the program design should reflect the input of these staff members.  However, coordinating the efforts of team members to ensure smooth delivery of students’ programs is challenging. 

Paraprofessionals – In order for paraprofessionals to become “highly qualified” and effectively utilized, schools must:
·         Develop clear job descriptions.
Instructional role
School support role
Liaison role
Personal support role
One-to-one role
Team membership, emotional support for students, monitoring student performance, staff development
General school duties, basic classroom support tasks, community based instruction
Adapting materials, peer facilitator, linkage with family
Personal care, therapy objectives, assist student with work assist with entire class
Provision of i-class support to individual students
·         Create a schedule and guidelines for supervision and link supervision to in-service training.
o   Face-to-face contact with their immediate professional supervisors (general/special educators)
o   Regular observation as they engage in the activities they do most often
o   Constructive feedback on their performance

·         Provide daily work schedules and written guidelines and link to supervision and in-service.  This involves collaboration, revisions regularly, team-generated plans for addressing challenging behavior, coordination of services, definition of roles, etc…)
·         Support the active involvement of paraprofessionals on the collaborative teams of the students they serve and the following benefits are observed:
o   Their addition of information and ideas adds to the quality of team decisions
o   Their participation enhances their knowledge and skill development
o   Being active team members contributes to their positive relationship within the school community
To ensure the paraprofessional has all of these tools, a notebook for each aide should contain a daily schedule, IEP goals for children serving, data collection forms, and other vital information.

Coordinating with Related Service Providers – When therapy is provided in the context of classroom activities, teachers and specialists confer with each other four times more often than when therapy is on a pull-out basis.  Elementary teachers were asked to describe the roles of related services providers in delivering coordinated programs in inclusive classrooms and they provided the following guidelines:
1.       Reduce pull-out services, and use opportunities to work in the context of the class activities.
2.       Provide equipment that helps the child participate in class and school activities.
3.       Have flexible schedules that allow therapy to be provided during the most relevant times.
4.       Based on the teacher’s unit topics or lesson plans, weave therapy into planned class activities.
5.       Come prepared with adaptations, and be able to facilitate the student’s active participation in the class.
6.       Be sensitive enough to know when to stay in the classroom and when to leave. 

Coordinating with Family Members – Family time, resources, attitude and prior experience figure into every family’s ability and desire to “be involved” with their child’s education.  However, evidence does not support a cause-and-effect relationship between improvements in parent involvement and improvements in student learning (Mattingly, Prislin, McKenzie, Rodriques, and Kayzar, 2002).  When involvement is viewed as information sharing rather than simply attending school meetings, schools can improve the relationships between families and teams. 
Communications – A notebook (home-school journal) can be utilized to communicate with families.  This can be used by teachers for students with disabilities, at-risk students and/or students with challenging behavior.  Collaborate with the parents as to who will have access to the notebook, what will and will not be written in the notebook, who will write in it and how often it will be written in.  These notebooks can be used as data collection and periodically reviewed in team meetings.  Avoid putting trivial information or consistently bad news in the notebook.  Instead, use it as a vehicle for sharing positive and relevant information about students between home and school. 
Facilitating Parent Participation in Team Interactions – Be considerate when scheduling meetings with family members, confirming the date/time beforehand.  Friend/Cook (2003) and Dabkowski (2004) suggest that the most familiar school staff should act as a host, sitting nearest to the family members and providing the parent with the meeting information.  Keep in mind a family’s sensitivity toward disabilities and at-risk behavior, always allowing time for a family’s questions and/or their opinion/views. 

Sunday, July 24, 2011

My thoughts on Chapter 4 - Problem Solving for McHarg

After reviewing all of this, I thought about how this applies to us.  I began a “google” search on problem solving and found some interesting articles (some on PS, some not) which made me think about what we could accomplish through collaboration.  Included in many of them was information on RTI (Response to Intervention)  and ICT (Instructional Consultation Teams) .  

 RTI is about interventions – finding the most effective intervention for a child in an effort to help him or her learn with success.  With our sped identification, we label according to what a test says, not whether or not the instructional interventions are working.  Is that effective?  My belief is all children can learn - at the right time, with right tools, in the right environment.  When children are tested, they are removed from the class, tested with a stranger and completed on someone else's time.  Wow!  
So, I would rather depend on early, appropriate, evidence-based interventions to support our students - not the tests given when and how it is convenient for someone else.  Our discussions about how our children are learning best, are going to be very powerful!  I feel that through our collaborative teams, we will be able to take the time to examine our procedures/strategies/programs/techniques more thoroughly and collect data as to which children are or are not responding.  If a child is not progressing, what other technique, approach, etc… can we implement  to help him or her?   According to Albert Einstein, insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.  If what we are doing is not producing adequate results, teams can problem solve and hopefully find solutions all in an attempt to help all children learn!  Check it out:Description: http://i.brainyquote.com/i/t.gifhttp://www.nasponline.org/resources/principals/nassp_probsolve.aspx
I have also contacted RU’s T/TAC and inquired about their assistance with ICTs.  I believe we are very capable of creating successful teams, but would love to have some support so that we have someone to ask questions of.  I will keep you posted. 
In the meantime, I am developing an agenda for our August 1st get together.  It will focus on our Mission, our goals, what we value, what we want to happen (plan), Team Ground Rules, Team Roles, and  Problem-Solving Techniques.  I am looking forward to collaborating with you!  Ellen

Chapter 4 - Problem Solving


Chapter 4 - Problem Solving and Action Planning
In an effort for teams to identify students needing intervention, examining data, using the data to improve instruction and ensure consistency in implementation and to problem-solve any relevant issues, effective problem solving methods must be embraced.
Problem Solving methods range from simple to complex.  The basic process includes repeating a multiple-step cycle to reach and refine a solution:
·         Identify concerns (define the problem)
·         Watch and talk (gather and share info)
·         Throw out ideas (brainstorm)
·         Say whether each idea sounds good or won’t work (evaluating the ideas)
·         Give the best idea a try
·         Watch and talk more (evaluating the solution, refining it, and beginning the cycle again)

The following sections provide guidelines for solving concerns teams have about student progress.

Steps 1 – Identify the problem
·         Take a divergent/convergent approach – 1.  List visible problem(s)      2.  Converge on one                  3. Define or restate problem to reflect the group’s view    
·         Prioritize – rank concerns from high to moderate to low in an effort to determine the priority
·         Re-write the problem in observable language-write down member’s view of the problem to condense and identify the problem
·         Categorize – determine the type of problem
·         Apply consensus-reaching method – compare the problem with student data

Step 2 – Brainstorm Possible Solutions - Generating as many alternative or potential solutions as possible.  Rules, when brainstorming, include:
1.       No negative reactions or comments
2.       Freewheeling(stating ideas as quickly as possible without taking turns thus promoting spontaneity and enthusiasm), round robin (taking turns in an around-the-circle fashion), slip method (team members write out ideas on paper and pass to recorder, mixed up and displayed for everyone), brainwriting (write on slips of paper and place in pile in middle of table, read it and add on) is welcomed; save criticism for later
3.       Withhold discussion and judgment
4.       Focus on quantity, not quality
5.       Set a short time limit; generate ideas quickly
6.       Assign a recorder who writes fast and translates ideas into phrases or key words

Step 3 – Evaluate the Possible Solutions – You must narrow your ideas down to those that will make the best solution.  To do this effectively and efficiently you must have criteria in which to apply each solution to.   Some common sense criteria includes feasibility, team consensus, peer approval, and cost. 

Step 4 – Choose a Solution – Choose a tentative one until it proves workable.

Step 5 – Write an action Plan – Team agendas need to include enough time to write action plans.  Primary elements include an issue, action, member’s responsibilities, timeline.

Step 6 – Evaluate the Plan and Make Needed Changes –

Problem Solving Techniques/Approaches and Methods:

Webpages with ideas:




Stages of the Osborn–Parnes Creative Problem-Solving process
Stage 1: Visionizing or Objective-Finding At this initial stage, the problem solvers
heighten their awareness through imagining potential challenges. First, they are
divergent, considering a variety of possible challenges. Then, they converge by
selecting one to begin solving.
Stage 2: Fact-Finding Problem solvers gather as much information as possible about
the selected challenge by using all of their perceptions and senses. By asking “who,
what, where, when, why, and how” questions, problem solvers are divergent in considering
multiple perspectives regarding the challenge.They finish this stage by identifying
facts they believe to be most relevant to the challenge.
Stage 3: Problem-Finding The purpose of this stage is to clarify the challenge or
problem by redefining it in new and different ways; by rephrasing the challenge as
a question, “In what ways might I/we . . . ?”; and by asking the question “Why?” or
“What do I/we really want to accomplish?” This process is repeated until the problem
solvers restate the problem in a way that makes the most sense and is most
appealing to them.
Stage 4: Idea-Finding At this stage, the objective is to defer judgment while generating
as many ideas as possible to potentially solve the challenge. Playfulness and wild
ideas are encouraged.To come up with ideas beyond the obvious, problem solvers
attempt to make new connections between ideas through analogies, manipulation
of ideas (e.g., magnifying, minifying, reversing, eliminating), and hitchhiking (i.e., making
new associations by building on someone else’s idea).
Stage 5: Solution-Finding At this stage of the process, a variety of criteria are considered
and ultimately selected for evaluating the merit of ideas. Problem solvers
use the criteria to assist in selecting the best solution.
Stage 6: Acceptance-Finding The problem solvers refine the solutions to make them
more workable.The objective is to turn ideas into action through the development
and implementation of an action plan. Regular evaluation of the solution helps
problem solvers discover new challenges and ways of addressing them as the action
plan is carried out.
Based on Osborn (1953/1993) and Parnes (1985, 1988, 1992).